Thoughts on the Waxman-Markey Climate Bill
Posted on September 25th, 2009Environmental News Network: The Waxman-Markey climate bill (HR 2454), passed in the U.S. House of Representatives today, is hailed by many as the most important piece of climate change legislation ever. Yet it’s still receiving a surprising amount of opposition from environmentalists, mostly for it’s plentiful polluter permits, weak renewable electricity goals, and low carbon emission reduction targets.
Greenpeace outright rejects the bill, claiming that it “sets emission reduction targets far lower than science demands, then undermines even those targets with massive offsets” and warning that “We simply no longer have the time for legislation this weak.” Friends of the Earth also warns against the bill, saying that in its current form, Waxman-Markey could actually increase the risks of climate change. But I still think the bill should be passed in the Senate. Here’s why.
The Waxman-Markey bill is undeniably less than perfect, but it’s still necessary. As our own Tom Schueneman notes, failure to pass something will result in embarrassment for the United States during the Copenhagen climate talks this December. If international leaders see that we can’t pass climate change legislation, it will hinder the chances of an international agreement. Let’s be real–the United States is a big polluter, but it’s about to become small potatoes compared to developing countries like China and India. Right now, we just need to set an example. We can work on improved legislation later.





Says:
[…] House Passes Historic Waxman-Markey Clean Energy Bill […]
# September 25th, 2009 2:27 pm